Scholarship @ UWindsor
Scholarship @ UWindsor is the institutional repository of the University of Windsor (UWindsor), showcasing and preserving the UWindsor community’s scholarly outputs, as well as items from the Leddy Library’s Archives & Special Collections. Its mission is to disseminate and preserve knowledge created or housed at the University of Windsor.
Contact scholarship@uwindsor.ca for more information.
Communities in Scholarship @ UWindsor
Select a community to browse its collections.
- Papers, presentations and abstracts of conferences held at the University of Windsor, in person and virtually.
- Digitized local items from the collections of the Leddy Library, University of Windsor, and community partners.
- Open Access Faculty publications, reports and working papers from academic departments at the University of Windsor.
- Formal graduate original research from the University of Windsor's Masters and Doctoral programs.
Recent Submissions
Item type: Item , Access status: Open Access , Introduction: Immigration, governmentality, and integration assemblages(Helsinki University Press, 2012-03-01) Randy K. Lippert; Miikka PyykkönennonPeerReviewedItem type: Item , Access status: Open Access , Doing Feminist Biblical Criticism in a Women's Studies Context(Consortium Erudit, 2012-01-01) Pamela J. MilneCan academic feminist biblical studies courses have a valid place within women's studies? This article examines how such courses, once housed in a religious studies program, have been refocused to equip women's studies students with analytical skills and to serve major themes in a women's studies curriculum.Item type: Item , Access status: Open Access , Effects of being uninsured or underinsured and living in extremely poor neighborhoods on colon cancer care and survival in California: historical cohort analysis, 1996—2011(BioMed Central, 2012-10-24) Kevin M. Gorey; Isaac Luginaah; Eric J. Holowaty; Guangyong Zou; Caroline Hamm; Emma Bartfay; Sindu Kanjeekal; Madhan K Balagurusamy; Sundus Haji-Jama; Frances C. WrightBackground: We examined the mediating effects of health insurance on poverty-colon cancer care and survival relationships and the moderating effects of poverty on health insurance-colon cancer care and survival relationships among women and men in California. Methods: We analyzed registry data for 3,291 women and 3,009 men diagnosed with colon cancer between 1996 and 2000 and followed until 2011 on lymph node investigation, stage at diagnosis, surgery, chemotherapy, wait times and survival. We obtained socioeconomic data for individual residences from the 2000 census to categorize the following neighborhoods: high poverty (30% or more poor), middle poverty (5-29% poor) and low poverty (less than 5% poor). Primary health insurers were Medicaid, Medicare, private or none. Results: Evidence of mediation was observed for women, but not for men. For women, the apparent effect of poverty disappeared in the presence of payer, and the effects of all forms of health insurance seemed strengthened. All were advantaged on 6-year survival compared to the uninsured: Medicaid (RR = 1.83), Medicare (RR = 1.92) and private (RR = 1.83). Evidence of moderation was also only observed for women. The effects of all forms of health insurance were stronger for women in low poverty neighborhoods: Medicaid (RR = 2.90), Medicare (RR = 2.91) and private (RR = 2.60). For men, only main effects of poverty and payers were observed, the advantaging effect of private insurance being largest. Across colon cancer care processes, Medicare seemed most instrumental for women, private payers for men. Conclusions: Health insurance substantially mediates the quality of colon cancer care and poverty seems to make the effects of being uninsured or underinsured even worse, especially among women in the United States. These findings are consistent with the theory that more facilitative social and economic capital is available in more affluent neighborhoods, where women with colon cancer may be better able to absorb the indirect and direct, but uncovered, costs of care.Item type: Item , Access status: Open Access , Breast cancer risk in relation to occupations with exposure to carcinogens and endocrine disruptors: a Canadian case–control study(BioMed Central, 2012-11-19) James T. Brophy; Margaret M. Keith; Andrew Watterson; Robert M. Park; Michael Gilbertson; Eleanor Maticka‐Tyndale; Matthias Beck; Hakam Abu-Zahra; Kenneth Schneider; Abraham Reinhartz; Robert DeMatteo; Isaac LuginaahBackground: Endocrine disrupting chemicals and carcinogens, some of which may not yet have been classified as such, are present in many occupational environments and could increase breast cancer risk. Prior research has identified associations with breast cancer and work in agricultural and industrial settings. The purpose of this study was to further characterize possible links between breast cancer risk and occupation, particularly in farming and manufacturing, as well as to examine the impacts of early agricultural exposures, and exposure effects that are specific to the endocrine receptor status of tumours. Methods: controls provided detailed data including occupational and reproductive histories. All reported jobs were industry- and occupation-coded for the construction of cumulative exposure metrics representing likely exposure to carcinogens and endocrine disruptors. In a frequency-matched case–control design, exposure effects were estimated using conditional logistic regression. Results: Across all sectors, women in jobs with potentially high exposures to carcinogens and endocrine disruptors had elevated breast cancer risk (OR = 1.42; 95% CI, 1.18-1.73, for 10 years exposure duration). Specific sectors with elevated risk included: agriculture (OR = 1.36; 95% CI, 1.01-1.82); bars-gambling (OR = 2.28; 95% CI, 0.94-5.53); automotive plastics manufacturing (OR = 2.68; 95% CI, 1.47-4.88), food canning (OR = 2.35; 95% CI, 1.00-5.53), and metalworking (OR = 1.73; 95% CI, 1.02-2.92). Estrogen receptor status of tumors with elevated risk differed by occupational grouping. Premenopausal breast cancer risk was highest for automotive plastics (OR = 4.76; 95% CI, 1.58-14.4) and food canning (OR = 5.70; 95% CI, 1.03-31.5). Conclusions: These observations support hypotheses linking breast cancer risk and exposures likely to include carcinogens and endocrine disruptors, and demonstrate the value of detailed work histories in environmental and occupational epidemiology.Item type: Item , Access status: Open Access , Creation of a Canadian Disability Studies Program: A Convergence of Multiple Pathways(University of Waterloo, 2012-08-30) Irene Carter; Donald R. Leslie; G. Brent Angell; Shelagh Towson; Debra Hernandez JozefowiczThis paper reports on the beginnings of the Disability Studies Program, University of Windsor (2011a), by describing the converging pathways of several events. Influential collaborative processes that occurred between major disability organizations and academics with the courage to promote change proceeded program development in disability studies. Choosing a philosophical approach, based on the social model of disability assured a critical approach to studying disability, enabling the program to address the desire to confront existing oppression and to produce graduates with expertise in many areas relevant to this goal. Most importantly, supportive individuals and organizations from the community made the Disability Studies Program, at the University of Windsor, a reality. The authors summarize the developments that preceded and followed the inauguration of the Disability Studies Program and make suggestions about further improvements.
